Government responds to WRB’s announcement of move to legislation and suspension of GCPI

The Government of Grenada, in close coordination with international consultants engaged under the World Bank-sponsored ECERA Project, conducted a comprehensive review of the electricity sector on the island.

The result of 2 years’ worth of consultations with leading figures in the industry is the new Electricity Supply Act of 2016.  Focusing on Grenada’s potential for renewable energy and alternative energy generation, that Act brings much-needed liberalisation to the sector.

Among several other things, the Act mandates that all electricity network providers should contribute 5% of pre-tax profits to a social fund for the benefit of the Grenadian people. Grenlec is currently the sole network provider on the island.  While Grenlec laments the contribution to this social fund — and is even seeking to sue the government over the constitutionality of this requirement — the fact remains that this is an ordinary exercise of the government’s regulatory powers.

The 2017 Amendment to the Act, which removed other categories of electricity providers (such as generating entities) from the 5% contribution, was made based on the recommendation of the expert consultants. They concluded that if all categories of electricity providers were to charge an additional 5% which will be passed through to the consumers, the net charge to the consumer would become unreasonably high, defeating one of the main goals of the act — lower electricity rates.

Moreover, Grenlec’s public statements do not account for the fact the entire 5% contribution is passed through directly to the consumer. Under the Act (and the Public Utilities Regulatory Commission Act) rate setting mechanism, all costs relating to activities outside the production of electricity such as the Social Fund, the Environmental Levy, the so-called ‘Grenlec Community Partnership Initiative (GCPI)’ are passed through to the consumer, just as Grenlec passes through any increases in fuel cost to the consumer as well. This rate setting mechanism guarantees Grenlec its profits as prescribed in the regulated environment.

Grenlec also neglects that the new act only puts into legislation what Grenlec is already required to do under its current contractual arrangement. The 1994 Share Purchase Agreement signed with the government requires Grenlec to contribute the same 5% of pre-tax profits to local charities but allows Grenlec to avoid the contribution if its board determines that a charitable contribution would have an adverse effect on the company. The new act will bring Grenlec’s profits into line with other regional utilities. Note Grenlec’s immediate cessation of contributing to the fund — a situation that was considered, even anticipated by the experts. The amendment will prevent the company from avoiding contribution to the social fund simply because its profits have not been as high as in years past.

Grenlec’s insinuation that the social fund will be mismanaged because it is no longer controlled by the company is similarly baseless.  The government reiterates that the entire amount of Grenlec’s contribution is being passed through directly to and paid by the Grenadian people. This 5% contribution is mandated both by contract and now by legislation. So, while Grenlec may be collecting the money, it does not belong to the company and in no way does the company have rights over its management.

The committee set up under the new act will ensure the continuance of social projects provided for by the fund, regardless of Grenlec’s corporate decision-making process. Of course, as a corporate citizen, Grenlec remains free to continue its own community outreach as it sees fit.

The government strongly believes that the new arrangement provided for in the 2017 amendment is more beneficial to the country as a whole, as it ensures that various social projects will continue despite Grenlec’s lack of participation because of reduced profits.

The government continues to express a willingness to meet with Grenlec to discuss the new act and its operation. Alternatively, we look forward to defending the Act in court, as we believe that it is a small price to pay in the interest of protecting and serving the people of Grenada.

Office of the Prime Minister

Article Footer 468x60

Facebook Comments

One thought on “Government responds to WRB’s announcement of move to legislation and suspension of GCPI

  1. admunro

    As a Grenadian national and electricity consumer, I feel it necessary to comment on the above press release from this current Government.

    With a team of consultants and experts, I’m aghast that it took two years to decide there is a potential within Grenada to develop and use renewable energy, thus liberalisation of this sector. With such a small island and population, how can you effectively generate, distribute and deliver a comprehensive service to customers at a lower cost by using multiple entities.

    The Electricity Supply Act, if implemented correctly will be of immense benefit. This Act should indeed explore the possibility of developing and using alternative energy that would directly benefit the Grenadian consumers through reduce costs. However, not at the expense of what is already in place delivering and excellent service.

    So, why is it necessary that the sole electricity network provider GRENLEC should contribute 5% of its pre-tax profit to a social fund controlled by “This Government”. Why not use it instead to explore, develop and generate alternative energy that would directly benefit and reduce operational cost to schools, hospitals, homes for the aged etc.. This way we will benefit directly or indirectly. Obviously, this will be in addition to the already existing social contributions GRENLEC makes to local communities.

    In regards to management of this new “Social Fund” and its 5% contribution. This should be removed from the influences of Governments, I recommend that it be managed by a non – political board or committee with a member from each parish.

    While the Government strongly believe that this new “social fund” will benefit the country as a whole. I’m also of similar thinking. however, there are track records of governments inefficiencies, low productivity resulting in delays, wastage and miss-management. In fact, what would have been of immense benefit to the country and its population is that of the revenue generated from the bidding process associated with oil and gas exploration
    in Grenada’s territorial waters.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts